top of page
  • Daniel Gray CPA Toronto

FIRPTA - Joint sellers in aggregate don't meet 300k exception but do meet it when split in half

Even where residential use requirement is met, that doesn't alleviate withholding requirements in a case where the property sold for over USD $300,000 but each taxpayer sold under $300,000.

Interesting, Code § 1445 (5)(B) is actually clearer than the regulation on this point, b/c the code says “realized for the property”, while Reg § 1.1445-2(d)(1) says “realized on the transaction”.

While from the Reg alone, I was inclined toward looking at the aggregate purchase price and not the amount realized per taxpayer and say that the Reg, when stating "the amount realized on the transaction" means just that. However, with the Reg using “Transaction“ one could argue that "the amount realized on the transaction" means on the transaction per each taxpayer. So, that Reg language alone isn't conclusive, at least to me.

In contrast, that argument can’t be made to say that “realized for the property” means per each taxpayer.

Reg § 1.1445-2(d)(1) Purchase of residence for $300,000 or less. No withholding is required under section 1445(a) if one or more individual transferees acquire a U.S. real property interest for use as a residence and the amount realized on the transaction is $300,000 or less.


Recent Posts

See All

Tax AI vs Tax Pro

I tested out IRS's new Form 1042-S Data Integrity Tool at This software program provides a no-cost standalone tool to assist in complying with

Stuck in IRS ITIN no-man's land

Canadians inherit pensions of deceased US resident relatives such as Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America (TIAA). IRS requires an ITIN letter saying the NRA already has (versus 'openi

bottom of page